From sewing machines to cars, new technologies have transformed labor markets. The personal computer’s impact on labor markets serves as a good reminder that tech innovations have created new, more numerous, and often higher paying jobs after an initial period of job displacement.
From 1970 to 2015, PCs destroyed 3.5 million U.S.-based jobs, largely related to typewriting, bookkeeping and auditing, according to a McKinsey & Company report. Over that same time frame, PCs also created 19.3 million jobs for a net gain of 15.8 million.
AI is likely no different, and we are witnessing some AI-related job displacement. It’s no coincidence layoffs are concentrated in tech companies heavily investing in AI. Many are focused on preserving profit margins, and several over hired during the pandemic. At the same time, they’re in bidding wars to hire AI researchers and developers.
Economists are beginning to include AI in economic models, and they’ve homed in on efficiency gains to understand AI’s impact on labor markets. Efficiency gains are higher for tasks with vast documentation such as law or coding, standardized tasks usually associated with entry-level positions, and high wage tasks ripe for cost cutting.
But it’s important to separate tasks from jobs. From my perspective, AI ultimately allows workers to focus on other, higher value activities and expand their current roles.
Of course, we can’t ignore the fact that tariffs and the uncertainty around them have led to layoffs and hiring freezes. The next few months could shed more light on the trajectory of job markets, but for now, I don’t see evidence of widespread pain.