Important Information

THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS who are U.S. residents ONLY; not intended for access or distribution to retail investors.

 

In order to access the Capital Group U.S. Institutional website (the “Site”), please read the following information and affirm by clicking the accept button that you have read and understand the information provided.

 

You must attest that you meet the qualifications of an institutional investor as described herein and accept these Terms and Conditions in order to access the Site. Some content may require additional registration for access.

 

The Site is solely intended for U.S. residents who are institutional investors or are acting on behalf of an institutional investor who has agreed to these Terms and Conditions. Institutional investors include, but are not limited to any person acting on behalf of/any pension fund, financial intermediary, consultant, endowment and foundation, bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or under applicable state law, government entity, entity with total assets of at least $50 million, employee benefit or qualified retirement plan with at least 100 participants, defined contribution/benefit plan, and qualified client or purchaser as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. By agreeing to these Terms and Conditions you are affirming your understanding that the Site is not intended for retail investors, individual plan participants or others who may not possess the financial sophistication to independently understand the content nor should it be redistributed to such persons.

 

You understand that the Site does not constitute advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice by Capital Group or its associates.

 

The reference to “Capital Group” used herein includes The Capital Group Companies, Inc., and its affiliates.

Categories
Bonds
The strategic value of allocating to high yield
Edward Harrold
Investment Director
Alvaro Peró Gala
Investment Director

Over the past five years, financial markets have navigated an exceptionally turbulent period that has been marked by multiple severe shocks. These include the pandemic in 2020, aggressive rate hikes by central banks in 2022, the geopolitical upheaval from the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022, the banking crisis in the United States in 2023 and the imposition of new tariffs in 2025. Despite these significant disruptions, the high-yield (HY) market has demonstrated remarkable resilience and has outperformed most other fixed income sectors by a substantial margin.

There are reasons to believe structural changes in the high-yield market have made it more resilient to shocks and we believe it appears well-positioned to continue to deliver strong results in the future. These strengths also could partially explain why spreads have been trading at relatively tight levels compared to long-term historic averages and can continue to do so absent an external shock.


High yield has outpaced most fixed income sectors since 2020

Line chart showing the performance of five fixed income indexes from December 2019 to May 2025. The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2 Percent Issuer Capped Index rises sharply after 2020, reaching a cumulative return near 30 percent by May 2025, outperforming all other indexes. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index and Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Index show modest, steady gains with low positive returns. The JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified Composite Index exhibits volatility, dipping in 2022 before a partial recovery. The Bloomberg ABS ex AAA Index also shows a volatile path, with a dip around 2022 and modest recovery by 2024.

Chart source(s): Bloomberg. Data as of May 31, 2025. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods.

The high-yield market is no longer junk

The composition of the HY market has undergone a significant transformation over the past two decades. Since the global financial crisis (GFC) in the early 2000’s, there has been a transfer of leverage from the private sector – corporates and households – to the public sector and this has made corporates much more disciplined in how they approach debt. Consequently, the quality of companies within the HY index has markedly improved. The BB cohort — the highest quality segment within HY — now constitutes more than 50% of the index; the B and CCC cohort has been shrinking over the past 15 years.

At the same time, secured bonds have reached a record high representing approximately 42% of the market. This structural change, driven by issuers seeking lower refinancing costs providing collateral, especially among lower rated names, has influenced the rating quality shift and improved their risk profile.

These improvements in quality and structure explain not only why spreads have been trading below historic averages in recent years but also why the HY market has been resilient during periods of stress. Investors are effectively taking less credit risk in today’s HY market.


The credit quality of the high-yield markets has improved

High-yield index ratings quality mix

A line graph titled “High-yield index ratings quality mix” showing the percentage  distribution of BB, B and CCC rated bonds from 1993 to 2025. The x axis spans from 1993 to 2025 and the y axis ranges from 0 to 60 percent. Over time, the share of BB rated bonds has increased, especially after 2020, indicating an improvement in overall credit quality. B rated bonds have remained relatively stable, while CCC rated bonds have declined significantly since the early 2000s. By 2025, BB rated bonds make up the largest portion of the index

Chart source(s): Bloomberg. Data as of June 30, 2025.


Current backdrop is supportive of HY spreads

Corporates appear to be in good shape with strong fundamentals. While sales and earnings growth have moderated (although, importantly, both remain positive), total debt outstanding is largely unchanged. This means both leverage ratios and interest coverage ratios are in a strong starting position to navigate a potential economic slowdown and to absorb part of the cost increases expected to result from current U.S. trade policy.

Additionally, year-to-date, HY issuance has been relatively subdued, falling below the average levels observed over the past four years. This trend reflects the cautious stance of issuers in the face of higher borrowing costs. Looking ahead, the outlook for HY issuance remains relatively benign. A substantial portion of the maturities for 2025 and 2026 has already been addressed, with less than 5% of the HY market expected to require refinancing by end of year. This limited refinancing need suggests a relatively stable issuance environment in the near term. With U.S. policy rates in the middle of the easing cycle, companies have ample room to wait for rates to normalize gradually and address their maturity walls in 2028 and beyond.


Market technicals remain supportive

U.S. supply issuance muted vs. recent averages

Bar chart titled “U.S. supply issuance muted vs recent averages” comparing gross  issuance in U.S. dollars billions across four financial instruments: U.S. Corporate Investment Grade (IG), U.S. High Yield, U.S. Loans and U.S. Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs). For U.S. Corporate IG, 2025 year to date (YTD) issuance is higher than the prior 4 year YTD average ($643B vs. $551B). U.S. High Yield shows a decline ($77B vs. $110B). U.S. Loans show an increase ($343B vs. $251B) along with U.S. CLOs ($166B vs. $94B).

Chart source(s): J.P. Morgan data as of May 5, 2025.


Over the past decade, there has been a notable shift in corporate capital-raising preferences, with many companies opting for private credit and loans over the traditional HY market. This preference is driven by the flexibility to negotiate tailored deals with private credit managers and banks, which better align with their specific needs. The shift is expected to continue, providing a strong technical tailwind for the HY market as demand exceeds supply. In turn, this should help push spreads tighter.

Consequently, while the aggregate size of the HY market has remained relatively flat over the past 10 years, the private credit and leveraged loan markets have expanded, exponentially overtaking HY. The trend is particularly evident in leveraged buyout (LBO) transactions, which were previously heavily reliant on HY bonds. Over the past 20 years, there has been a noticeable shift toward leveraged loans. And in the past five years, the market has grown to be dominated by private credit, which has become the preferred choice for the vast majority of LBO transactions.


Plenty of opportunities to find value through active management



Since “Liberation Day” in early April 2025, dispersion within the high-yield market has surged to levels not seen in the past five years. Despite relatively tight index spreads, the standard deviation of option-adjusted spreads (OAS) in the HY universe has widened sharply – signaling a growing divergence in credit risk pricing across issuers.  While HY spreads have almost remained unchanged year-to-date, transportation and energy have been clear underperformers while REITs (real estate investment trusts) and consumer non-cyclicals have been the strongest in this period (as of June 25, 2025).

This divergence is further evidenced by the distribution of securities. Over 500 bonds trade above the index average OAS, and nearly 200 exceed it by more than 200 basis points. Such a wide variation in spreads reflects heightened investor scrutiny and the uneven sectoral impact from macro shocks — particularly the tariff-driven volatility that followed Liberation Day. This variation helps create multiple opportunities for bottom-up active investors to capture value.


High yield can offer compelling opportunities for active management

Despite tight index level spread, dispersion at the security level is elevated

A line graph titled “Despite tight index level spread, dispersion at the security level is elevated compared to history” with a subtitle “Dispersion (Standard deviation OAS/Weighted Average OAS)”. The x axis spans from 2019 to 2025 and the y axis ranges from 0 to 3.5. The graph shows a sharp peak in dispersion around early 2020, reaching just above 3, followed by a steep decline to almost 0.5 by mid 2021. From there, dispersion gradually rises with fluctuations, reaching approximately 2 by early 2025. The chart highlights that index level spreads remain tight.

Chart source(s): Bloomberg, Capital Group, Barclays Research. As of May 31, 2025. Dispersion is defined as the standard deviation of OAS divided by the weighted average index OAS, winsorized at the 1% level, with extreme values capped at the 1st and 99th percentiles, using monthly data.


Sectors such as REITs continue to appear attractive due to their robust cash flows and predictable earnings, even in a potential scenario where the economy slows down. REITs benefit from stable rental income and property appreciation. Conversely, sectors like capital goods, building materials and autos are potentially more exposed due to their cyclical nature and vulnerability to an escalation of trade barriers between countries.

These more vulnerable sectors often face significant volatility and capital-intensive operations, which can strain their financial stability during economic slowdowns. Therefore, it is important to be selective and active to extract value in an environment where valuations at an aggregate level are tight. Today, selectivity is more important than ever due to the uncertainty around how, when and where tariffs will be implemented.


High-yield volatility has been muted relative to investment grade

A line graph labled “HY and IG rolling 12 month standard deviation” illustrates the standard deviation trends of U.S. High Yield and U.S. Investment Grade bonds from June 2010 to June 2025. The x axis spans time and the y axis represents standard deviation ranges from 0 to 5. The U.S. High Yield shows significant peaks around mid 2011, early 2016, mid 2020, and late 2022 while the U.S. Investment Grade spread fluctuates less than U.S. HY. Both lines show cyclical trends over the 15 year period.

Chart source(s): Barclays. Data as of June 30, 2025. Indexes: HY: Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index, IG: Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Index


What can investors expect going forward?
  
In the absence of an external shock, spreads can remain below historical averages for an extended period. Such a scenario has been not uncommon, historically speaking. Spreads remained at very tight levels for several years during the 1990s and 2000s. In the past 15 years when HY spreads have been tighter than long-term historic averages, the U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index has outpaced the U.S. Aggregate Index by more than 50% on average over the next 12 months. As the following chart highlights, the two indexes have delivered 12-month forward results under such periods of 4% (U.S. HY) and 2.5% (U.S. Aggregate).


Return differential between HY and broader bond market

A bar chart compares return differentials between high yield (HY) and the broader bond  market using two indexes: Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index and Bloomberg U.S.  Corporate High Yield 2 percent Issuer Capped Index. It includes two sets of bars: one  for average annualized return and another for 12 month forward return when spreads  are tighter than the historical average. In the first set, the aggregate index shows a  return of 3 percent, while the high yield index shows 6.4 percent, resulting in a 3.4 percent differential. In the second set, the aggregate index shows 2.5 percent and the  high yield index 4 percent, resulting in a 1.5 percent differential. Data is as of December  31, 2024.

Chart source(s): Bloomberg. As of December 31, 2024.


Additionally, investors can benefit from a more resilient asset class. The gradual increase in quality has also made the U.S. HY market much more resilient to stress periods than in the past. This resilience was evident in the recent drawdown post Liberation Day in early April this year. Unlike previous instances such as from June to December 2008, where U.S. equities and U.S. HY traded in line falling -28.5% and -25.1% respectively, this year, the drawdown in U.S. HY was a fraction of that experienced by equities (-15% fall in S&P 500 vs. -1.8% fall in U.S. HY –January 1 to April 8, 2025).



Edward Harrold is an Investment Director with 18 years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds a bachelor’s degree in international relations from the London School of Economics.

Alvaro Peró Gala is an Investment Director with six years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds an MBA from INSEAD, France, and holds both a master’s and bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña.


The indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.


Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.  The Index is used with permission.  The Index may not be copied, used, or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s prior written approval. Copyright 2025, JPMorgan Chase & Co.  All rights reserved.


Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively "Bloomberg"). Bloomberg or Bloomberg's licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg's licensors approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.


Each S&P Index ("Index") shown is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2025 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

RELATED INSIGHTS

Don’t miss out

Get the Capital Ideas newsletter in your inbox every other week

For financial professionals only. Not for use with the public.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
The value of fixed income securities may be affected by changing interest rates and changes in credit ratings of the securities.
There have been periods when the results lagged the index(es) and/or average(s). The indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively "Bloomberg"). Bloomberg or Bloomberg's licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg's licensors approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Capital Client Group, Inc.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.