Capital Ideas^™ 
Investment insights from Capital Group

When French philosopher René Descartes wrote “I think, therefore I am,” he likely didn’t envision a future dominated by artificial intelligence. Yet as AI transforms society, company executives and inquisitive investors are wrestling with similarly fundamental issues about where the technology is headed and how events may unfold.

Against this backdrop, we sat down with our economists and portfolio managers to answer your biggest questions about the risks and rewards of AI. Here are the highlights.

1. Will the AI stock market boom end with a bust?

Mark Casey, principal investment officer, Fundamental Investors® and portfolio manager, CGGR — Capital Group Growth ETF

I am an optimist about how AI will play out over the next several years. I believe we’re in a real boom and that AI is an unstoppable trend. Are certain stocks overpriced? Sure. Could the AI build-out slow? Absolutely.

But could the entire AI economy turn out to be as overpriced as the internet sector was in 1999 or early 2000? I don't think so. First, valuations for several AI stocks are far cheaper than they were during the tech bubble. The market has already priced in slower growth and lower future earnings for some companies tied to the build-out, such as NVIDIA, Broadcom, and memory chipmakers Micron Technology and SK hynix. Second, the economy AI is being sold into is larger and more digital than it was in the late 1990s, so earnings potential is stronger. As with most technologies, I would expect market leaders to rotate from one beneficiary to another as the trend unfolds.

Still, investing in any major trend requires making an informed guess about a company’s future earnings power relative to its current stock price. One approach to investing in AI beneficiaries is to find companies that are already good businesses. These are companies that don’t have to lower prices for their products or services when they cut costs — they just get to keep the extra profit. So even if the pace of AI adoption slows, companies that can turn the technology into higher profits are likely to emerge as long-term winners. For example, Meta and Alphabet both use AI to increase user engagement and advertising revenue. There are other trends I view as unstoppable as well, such as the development of smokeless tobacco products at companies like Philip Morris, the long-term growth of air travel with businesses such as TransDigm, and the needs of an aging population through healthcare and real estate owners such as Welltower.

2. How long could the AI boom last?

Cheryl Frank, portfolio manager, CGUS — Capital Group Core Equity ETF and American Mutual Fund®

We’re in the midst of a huge AI investment cycle. Enterprise adoption may be an unstoppable freight train, even if companies rely less on cutting-edge frontier models over time. There could be a 20-year effort to implement AI across industries and use cases, which makes data center growth and financing central to the story.

As part of Capital Group’s Night Watch team, I try to identify systemic tail risks well in advance. Today, AI development is constrained by data center capacity, which gives companies that control those bottlenecks pricing power. If models become more efficient or more tasks shift to open-source solutions, I can see these constraints easing and AI adoption broadening significantly.

There will be moments when events or investor sentiment cause markets to reassess the AI trade, but I think this technology will change how we do things forever. That doesn’t mean today’s market leadership will stay the same. At some point the industry will likely be overbuilt, and some of these companies will see their stock prices fall. The bigger opportunities may be with the businesses using AI to improve efficiency and create new products and services. This could lead to a broader set of winners.

3. Could opposition to data centers slow AI development?

Michael Beckwith, principal investment officer, AMCAP Fund® and portfolio manager, Capital World Growth and Income Fund®

The AI build-out may be more difficult to stop than investors realize. If we stopped building data centers today, it would hurt the United States’ competitive position and make the path toward artificial superintelligence bumpier, but it won’t stop the boom. Many projects have already been permitted and will likely get built regardless, so more capacity could come online for years.

Demand for data centers has been strong, in part because several companies are seeing the benefits of using AI. For example, UnitedHealthcare reduced prescription approval times to an average of 30 seconds from eight hours, according to an April 2026 earnings call. Truck brokerage company C.H. Robinson slashed the time required to receive a quote to 31 seconds from 17 to 20 minutes, according to the company’s blog post. With the Federal Reserve estimating that only 20% of companies are using AI, adoption will likely increase given the tangible productivity we’ve seen so far.

There is a realistic scenario where a high-profile AI failure or an increasingly vocal community backlash to data centers triggers restrictions that significantly slow the pace of development. Local opposition blocked or delayed 75 such projects worth about $130 billion in the first quarter of this year, equaling the total for all of 2025, according to Data Center Watch.

4. Will higher interest rates impact the AI build-out?

Shannon Ward, portfolio manager, CGMS — Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF and CGHY — Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF

Bond investors are becoming more selective about financing AI-related projects, especially as 10-year U.S. Treasury yields have risen above 5.25% in early October. That relatively attractive risk-free rate combined with the ample supply of debt to fund the AI build-out means that investors can demand higher yields and more favorable terms when it comes to AI debt deals.

It’s important to differentiate between higher quality investment-grade bonds (BBB/Baa and above) issued by large technology companies and debt issued by more speculative borrowers. Despite strong balance sheets, substantial cash flows, and proven businesses, some of the debt issued by these borrowers is trading at wider spreads than many industrial companies. This is partly because of the amount of debt issued in a short period of time and the expectation of more AI-related debt issuance to come.

As a high-yield investor, I’m paying attention to this debt surge and where it is trading, while being selective when it comes to investing in below investment grade debt (BB/Ba and below) issued to fund the AI build-out. With a lot of options available to me across the ratings spectrum and keeping in mind that more issuance is likely to come, I am being very patient when it comes to allocating to the sector.

If the cost of capital to fund new AI-related infrastructure continues to climb, the biggest winners may be facilities already well on their way to completion and those already up and running. Demand for AI computing capacity is still strong, so existing facilities could charge more for their services. Similarly, I could see issuance slow given the backup in demand for debt, which could require companies to fund more of the build-out using equity. This could make future new issuance more attractive than what’s already in the market given the potential for lower leverage.

5. How worried should we be about AI doom scenarios?

Jared Franz, U.S. economist

I think we should be concerned but not panicked. Over the last few months, AI agents from OpenAI and others have gone rogue, with hundreds of agents coordinating to hack unsuspecting companies. These incidents highlight an alignment problem: AI models have become more capable but remain far behind on staying inside their sandbox.

I’m not surprised by these attacks because large language models reflect the world in which they’ve been trained. And just like the real world, AI labs need strong guardrails and legal standards to help society navigate the coming change.

I don’t think AI will bring about an end to humanity, but we should be prepared for a world in which major hacks and other real-world harm become more common. Creating a so-called “kill switch” that quickly shuts down AI systems makes sense in case these models dangerously veer off course. A bipartisan bill that would require AI labs to establish such a mechanism has stalled in Congress, though California Governor Gavin Newsom has more recently signed an executive order to study the issue.

California recently enacted several laws placing guardrails on AI safety, employment decisions, and healthcare use, among others. New York has adopted similar measures, and I expect there will be more legislation in the years to come.