How we pursue consistency in high-income bond investing

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Our high-yield corporate and municipal managers seek to mitigate the effects of pronounced volatility by taking a relative value approach to risk management.
  • Within this approach, our high-yield and municipal managers seek to produce risk-adjusted excess returns through a number of active management factors, including idiosyncratic security selection, credit quality, duration and yield curve positioning.
  • Over the past five years, our relative value approach to risk management has helped our American High-Income Trust (AHIFX; F-2 share class) and our American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AHMFX; F-2 share class) achieve higher absolute and risk-adjusted returns than their Morningstar peers.
  • As of March 31, 2025, AHIFX and AHMFX have also ranked in the top 20% of their Morningstar peer groups across the most recent one-, five- and 10-year time periods, as well as since each fund’s inception. And in many cases, the funds have reached the top decile – a remarkable achievement considering the historical volatility of the sectors in which these funds invest.

Like alpine mountaineering, investing in high-yield corporate and municipal bonds can involve a significant degree of risk. While the potential gains may be attractive – a stunning summit or the enhanced returns that higher yielding bonds can produce over time – navigating the high-yield corporate and municipal markets requires disciplined portfolio management to generate consistent excess returns. One way we seek to achieve this objective is to reduce market volatility by focusing on a relative value approach to risk management.

As a general rule – and particularly during market dislocations – high-yield corporate and municipal bonds can be volatile. Accordingly, high-yield corporate and municipal returns can vary widely from year to year depending on a number of factors, including broad market sentiment, prevailing interest rates and the macroeconomic environment. Over the past 20 years, for example, one-year high-yield corporate returns have ranged from 58.76% in 2009 to -25.88% in 2008, while one-year high-yield municipal returns have ranged from 32.74% in 2009 to -27.01% in 2008. 

Since 2005, high-yield corporate and municipal returns have been volatile

A bar chart titled, “Since 2005, high-yield corporate and municipal returns have been volatile.” The chart shows high-yield corporate and municipal bond one-year returns from 2005 to 2024. Returns shown are as of December 31 for each year. One-year high-yield corporate returns have ranged from 58.76% in 2009 to -25.88% in 2008, while one-year high-yield municipal returns have ranged from 32.74% in 2009 to -27.01% in 2008. In general, the chart indicates that high-yield corporate and municipal returns can be volatile.

Source: Bloomberg. As of 12/31/24. Returns shown are as of December 31 for each year. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods.

Despite this volatility, over the past 20 years high-yield corporate bonds have averaged an annualized excess return of 364 basis points (bps) over similar-duration Treasuries, while high-yield municipal bonds have averaged an annualized excess return of 163 bps1
 

The accordion approach: Managing risk across market cycles
 

Given this excess return potential, how can high-yield corporate and municipal managers generate consistent excess returns across market cycles? One essential component is to maintain a disciplined portfolio management process throughout periods of intense market stress, including tactical asset allocation decisions at the sector and individual security levels. At the same time, our high-yield corporate and municipal managers seek to mitigate the effects of pronounced volatility by taking a relative value approach to risk management.
 

Think of an accordion: A skilled musician expands and contracts an accordion to hit important notes and make the flow of a composition smooth and pleasing to the audience. By the same token, our high-yield corporate and municipal managers expand and contract their risk exposure in different market environments to mitigate volatility and seek consistent excess returns.
 

In markets where we believe high-yield corporates and/or municipals are overvalued, our managers will contract their risk exposure and increase their allocations to higher quality issues. Conversely, in markets where we think high-yield corporates and/or municipals are undervalued, our managers will expand their risk exposure and emphasize lower quality issues.
 

For example, since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, the American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AHMFX; F-2 share class) has materially decreased its exposure to the tobacco sector. While the sector remains a large part of the municipal market, our portfolio managers believe that it’s been largely overvalued and that it relies on poor credit fundamentals – namely, the long-term decline in smoking among U.S. consumers.
 

At the same time, AHMFX has increased its risk exposure to certain tax allocation bonds. These particular credits, which help fund redevelopment projects and pay investors back through pledged higher taxes on reassessed real estate values, are primarily supported by new construction activity in the Denver and Colorado Springs areas. Despite high mortgage rates, development in these areas continues to move forward. The AHMFX team favors the high levels of spread and yield compensation that these tax allocation bonds offer, as well as the fact that their payment structures don’t depend on near-term construction activity. Instead, they rely on a more moderate pace of development that aligns with our long-term outlook for buildout in these regions. Taken together, our portfolio managers believe that these allocation changes have provided AHMFX with a more beneficial risk/reward profile.

 

Research is part of our DNA
 

Within our relative value approach to risk management, our high-yield and municipal managers seek to produce risk-adjusted excess returns through a number of active management factors, including idiosyncratic security selection, credit quality, duration and yield curve positioning. Of course, idiosyncratic security selection depends on deep fundamental analysis, a discipline that we consider part of our DNA: understanding a bond issuer, its cash flows, and the probability that it will be able to make its debt payments on time. In addition, effective security selection depends on accurately assessing bond indentures, credit agreements (including the use of collateral) and lien structures so that we can potentially limit capital losses in the event of default.
 

Our taxable and tax-exempt high-yield teams think of the high-yield sector as one that involves asymmetric risks. In the best-case scenario, a high-yield issuer will pay its bond investors 100 cents on the dollar plus an attractive interest rate. But in the worst-case scenario, a high-yield issuer may default partially or completely, leaving bondholders with sharp capital losses. Or to return to the mountaineering analogy: In the best case, a climber scales a difficult peak and reaches a world-class summit; in the worst case, falls can be costly. As such, utilizing deep fundamental research to minimize capital losses becomes an extremely important part of achieving consistent returns in higher yielding bond investing.
 

In-depth research yields critical insights  
 

Our investment-grade (BBB/Baa and above) and high-yield (BB/Ba and below) research teams collaborate on hundreds of calls and site visits per year with bond issuers like hospitals and utilities companies. This collaboration – and the working relationships that our research teams develop along the way – help us to assess the issuers’ operational and financial health, which in turn helps us determine the relative value of their bonds.
 

For example, over the past few years, our investment-grade, high-yield and equity research teams have met with the senior management teams of several California utilities and have done extensive analysis of these companies’ financial metrics. The depth of this research became invaluable when we evaluated these issuers in the aftermath of the wildfires that devastated parts of Los Angeles early this year. In the wake of the damage, some bond investors simply wanted out of California utilities, apparently regardless of the actual risks within the financial equation. Fortunately, our fundamental analysis and our understanding of 2019 legislation that limited the amount of liability that California utilities would incur helped us to assess the value of these issuers’ bonds from a more rational standpoint.
 

Contrary to market consensus, our analysts concluded that California utilities were generally well-equipped to handle even the worst liability claims that might arise from the wildfires. On that basis, when fearful investors began selling these bonds at significant discounts to our view of fair value, we were generally buying, with high conviction that the intrinsic value of these bonds would eventually be reflected in their prices. Ultimately, we believe that these investments will yield attractive upside for our investors.
 

Producing higher absolute and risk-adjusted returns
 

Over the past five years, our relative value approach to risk management has helped our American High-Income Trust (AHIFX; F-2 share class) and our American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund achieve higher absolute and risk-adjusted returns than their Morningstar peers.
 

1 Source: Bloomberg. As of 4/30/25. Based on the 20-year return of the Bloomberg 3-7-Year U.S. Treasury Index versus the returns of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index and the Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index, respectively. 

AHIFX and AHMFX have outpaced their peer groups

A chart titled, “AHIFX and AHMFX have outpaced their peer groups.” The chart shows the five-year return and Sharpe ratio for the American High-Income Trust (F-2 share class), the American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (F-2 share class), the Morningstar high-yield municipal bond category average and the Morningstar high-yield bond category average over the past five years as of 5/31/25. The five-year return for the American High Income Trust was 7.37%, while its Sharpe ratio was 0.65. The five-year return for the American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund was 3.21%, while its Sharpe ratio was 0.07. The five-year return for the Morningstar high-yield municipal bond category average was 1.83%%, while its Sharpe ratio was -0.11. The five-year return for the Morningstar high-yield bond category average was 5.21%, while its Sharpe ratio was 0.37.

Sources: Capital Group, Morningstar. Data as of 5/31/25.

As of March 31, 2025, AHIFX and AHMFX have also ranked in the top 20% of their Morningstar peer groups across the most recent one-, five- and 10-year time periods, as well as since each fund’s inception. And in many cases, the funds have reached the top decile – a remarkable achievement considering the historical volatility of the sectors in which these funds invest. 

A long-term record of pursuing consistency

Morningstar percentile rankings

(based on total return) (updated monthly)

 


 

1 - 25
 

26-50
 

51-75
 

76-100
 

# of funds in category

Source: The category for American High-Income Trust is High Yield Bond; the category for American High-Income Municipal Bond is High Yield Muni. When applicable, results reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, without which they would have been lower. Please see capitalgroup.com for more information. Past results are no guarantee of results in future periods.

 

Additionally, both AHIFX and AHMFX have achieved “Total Return Within Category” ratings of 5 (the highest rating) from Lipper over three, five, and 10 years as of  May 31, 2025. For AHIFX, the total number of investment companies in the Lipper category over three, five and 10 years is 460, 419 and 318, respectively. For AHMFX, the total number of investment companies in the Lipper category over three, five and 10 years is 179, 173 and 114, respectively. Total return data are updated monthly.
 

The Capital System: multiple managers and highly experienced teams
 

Both AHIFX and AHMFX benefit from The Capital System™, in which each fund at Capital Group is managed by multiple portfolio managers and analysts. This distinctive investment approach is designed to deliver superior long-term investment results across asset classes. In our view, allowing a team of professionals to invest in their highest-conviction ideas creates an environment in which each manager or analyst can express his or her views within the portfolio, ideally resulting in a balance of views within the fund as a whole. In addition, both AHIFX and AHMFX maintain highly experienced portfolio management teams, with an average of 28 years of investment industry experience for AHIFX and 26 years for AHMFX as of March 31, 2025.
 

In contrast to many asset management firms, we also empower analysts to manage portfolio assets as part of The Capital System. We believe this is a competitive differentiator, and one that has strongly contributed to the success of AHIFX and AHMFX since their inception. Our skilled traders also contribute significantly to the success of our high-yield and municipal funds. Their in-depth market knowledge, well-developed counterparty relationships and rapid execution help our portfolio managers and analysts implement their investment ideas with speed, liquidity and minimal trading friction.

Team focus and deep experience help produce consistency

A table titled, “Team focus and deep expertise help produce consistency.” The table shows a column for “Team focus,” which highlights the ideas of a “bottom-up approach to security and sector selection,” and “identification of idiosyncratic credit opportunities.” The table also has a column labeled, “Deep bench of talent,” which shows the number of portfolio managers, analysts and traders for the American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund and the American High-Income Trust. For the American High-Income Trust, the numbers are: portfolio managers: 5; analysts: 9; traders: 5. For the American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund, the numbers are: portfolio managers: 3; analysts: 9; traders: 5.

Source: Capital Group. As of 12/31/24.

From a broad perspective, AHIFX and AHMFX seek consistency of returns as a goal in itself. While both portfolios are flexible enough to allow for opportunistic investing, the consistency of their returns is ultimately a product of careful fundamental analysis, disciplined risk management and the deep experience of our high-yield and municipal teams.

David Daigle

David Daigle is a fixed income portfolio manager with 30 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). He serves as the principal investment officer of American High-Income Trust®. He holds an MBA from the University of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Vermont.

chad-rach-color-600x600

Chad Rach is a fixed income portfolio manager with 32 years of investment experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds an MBA from the University of Chicago and a bachelor's from Marquette University.

Read all perspectives on bond markets

Figures shown are past results for Class F-2 shares and are not predictive of results in future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. View mutual fund expense ratios and returns. View current mutual fund SEC yields.

Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.


Sharpe ratio uses standard deviation (a measure of volatility) and return in excess of the risk-free rate to determine reward per unit of risk. The higher the number, the better the portfolio’s historical risk-adjusted performance.


The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index covers the universe of fixed-rate, non-investment-grade debt. The index limits the maximum exposure of any one issuer to 2%.

The Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index is a market-value-weighted index composed of municipal bonds rated below BBB/Baa.


Lipper Leader ratings are derived from highly sophisticated formulas that analyze funds against clearly defined criteria. Funds are compared to similar funds, and only those that truly stand out are awarded Lipper Leader status. Funds are ranked against their peers on each of four measures: Total Return, Consistent Return, Preservation, and Expense. A fifth measure, Tax Efficiency, applies in the United States. Scores are subject to change every month and are calculated for the following periods: 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and overall. The overall calculation is based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for each measure over 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods (if applicable). For each measure, the highest 20% of funds in each peer group are named Lipper Leaders. The next 20% receive a rating of 4; the middle 20% are rated 3; the next 20% are rated 2, and the lowest 20% are rated 1. While Lipper Leader ratings are not predictive of future performance, they do provide context and perspective for making knowledgeable fund investment decisions. A Lipper Leader for Total Return is a fund that has provided superior total returns when compared to a group of similar funds. Lipper Leaders for Total Return may be the best fit for investors who want the best historical return, without looking at risk. This measure alone may not be suitable for investors who want to avoid downside risk. For more risk-averse investors, Total Return ratings can be used with Preservation and/or Consistent Return ratings to make an appropriate selection that balances the risk and return. Lipper Leader ratings for Total Return reflect funds’ historical total return performance relative to peers. Ratings for Total Return are computed for all Lipper classifications with five or more distinct portfolios and span both equity and fixed-income funds (e.g., large-cap core, general U.S. Treasury, etc.). The ratings are subject to change every month and are calculated for the following time periods: 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and overall. The overall calculation is based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for the Total Return metrics over 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods (if applicable). The highest 20% of funds in each classification are named Lipper Leaders for Total Return. The next 20% receive a rating of 4; the middle 20% are rated 3; the next 20% are rated 2, and the lowest 20% are rated 1. Some peer groups are inherently more volatile than others – a Lipper Leader for Consistent Return in a volatile group may not be well-suited to shorter-term goals or less risk-tolerant investors. Lipper Leader fund ratings for Total Return reflect fund historic total return performance relative to peers. Lipper Ratings DO NOT take into account the effects of sales charges. Overall Ratings are based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for each measure over 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods (if applicable). Lipper Leader fund ratings do not constitute and are not intended to constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security of any entity in any jurisdiction. As a result, you should not make an investment decision on the basis of this information. Rather, you should use Lipper Ratings for informational purposes only. Certain information provided by Lipper may relate to securities that may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States (or any State thereof) or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons. Lipper is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information that you obtain from Lipper. In addition, Lipper will not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from information obtained from Lipper or any of its affiliates.


Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the mutual fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
The use of derivatives involves a variety of risks, which may be different from, or greater than, the risks associated with investing in traditional securities, such as stocks and bonds.
Lower rated bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal than higher rated bonds.
The return of principal for bond portfolios and for portfolios with significant underlying bond holdings is not guaranteed. Investments are subject to the same interest rate, inflation and credit risks associated with the underlying bond holdings.
Income from municipal bonds may be subject to state or local income taxes and/or the federal alternative minimum tax. Certain other income, as well as capital gain distributions, may be taxable. 
Investing outside the United States involves risks, such as currency fluctuations, periods of illiquidity and price volatility. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries.
There have been periods when the results lagged the index(es) and/or average(s). The indexes are unmanaged and, therefore, have no expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively "Bloomberg"). Bloomberg or Bloomberg's licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg's licensors approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only. Use of this website and materials is also subject to approval by your home office.
Capital Client Group, Inc.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.
© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Some of the information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar, its content providers nor Capital Group are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Information is calculated by Morningstar. Due to differing calculation methods, the figures shown here may differ from those calculated by Capital Group.